The Podcast Videographer’s Guide to Long-Term Project Archiving

For podcast videographers and content creators, the journey doesn’t end when you hit export. Archiving your project properly ensures that your work remains protected, accessible, and usable for years to come. Whether you’re working solo or managing a large production studio, this guide walks you through the best long-term storage options, comparing cost, reliability, and usability—plus, it gives you actionable workflows tailored to your needs.

---

🧠 Start Here: The 3-2-1 Video Backup Strategy

Before we talk hardware or cloud providers, you need a rock-solid backup philosophy. Enter the 3-2-1 backup rule—an industry-standard approach popularized by photographer Peter Krogh.

Here’s the breakdown:

• 3 copies of your data
  Your original file + two separate backups.

• 2 different types of storage media
  Example: a hard drive and a cloud service, to reduce risk from hardware-specific failures.

• 1 off-site backup
  This protects your data from local disasters like fire, flood, or theft.

A modern take for video professionals might look like:

• Copy 1 (Active Work): Your fast SSD or NAS for editing.

• Copy 2 (Local Backup): An external hard drive or second NAS, preferably stored in a different building.

• Copy 3 (Off-Site): Cloud storage (like Backblaze, Crashplan Pro) or an LTO tape stored at a remote location.

---

💾 Compare Your Options: Storage Types Breakdown

Here’s how the most common storage solutions stack up:

---

☁️ Option 1: Cloud Backup Services (Simple, Set-and-Forget)

These are designed for ease of use and automated protection, not daily collaboration or asset delivery. Ideal for archiving projects once they’re complete.

🔹 Backblaze Personal Backup

• Use Case: Personal computers, photographers, solo editors

• Cost: ~$9/month per computer (unlimited storage)

• Pros:

  • Truly unlimited storage

  • Auto-backups of external drives

  • Easy restore via web or shipped hard drive

• Cons:

  • Can’t backup NAS devices

  • Limited control over folder-level retention

🔹 CrashPlan Pro / Small Business

• Use Case: Solo creators or small studios

• Cost: ~$10/month per device (unlimited)

• Pros:

  • Business-grade security and versioning

  • Works on Windows, Mac, Linux

• Cons:

  • Not ideal for high-speed restoration of huge files

  • Less common in video workflows compared to Backblaze

🔹 iDrive / Acronis / Carbonite

• Similar to the above: All-in-one backup services with interfaces that prioritize simplicity over deep configurability.

• Good for off-site copies but less ideal for direct archive access or media pipelines.

✅ Best For:
Automated off-site backups with minimal setup.

---

💾 2. Cloud Object Storage (Advanced, Pay-as-You-Go)

These are enterprise-grade platforms built for developers, media professionals, and IT teams who want granular control over their storage architecture. They offer:

• APIs for automation

• Scalability into petabytes

• Different storage tiers (standard vs archive)

• Fine-grained pricing (storage, egress, PUT/GET requests)

---

🔹 Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service)

• Use Case: High-reliability storage for web delivery, archiving, or backup

• Cost:

  • ~$0.023/GB/month (Standard)

  • ~$0.004/GB/month (Glacier Deep Archive)

  • Egress fees: ~$0.09/GB out

  • Requests: Charged per API call (can add up)

• Pros:

  • Battle-tested infrastructure

  • Lifecycle policies (automatically move files to archive)

  • Integrates with AWS ecosystem

• Cons:

  • Confusing pricing

  • Costly if you need frequent access or restores

  • Requires knowledge of buckets, policies, IAM roles

---

🔹 Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

• Use Case: Budget-friendly alternative to Amazon S3

• Cost:

  • ~$0.005/GB/month (storage)

  • $0.01/GB (download)

  • Minimal API call charges

• Pros:

  • Clear pricing

  • Compatible with many S3 tools

  • Excellent for archive-style use cases

• Cons:

  • Slower feature rollout compared to AWS

  • Not optimized for hot storage or web delivery at scale

---

🔹 Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage

• Use Case: Low-cost S3-compatible storage with no egress fees

• Cost:

  • ~$5.99/TB/month

  • No egress or API call fees

• Pros:

  • Flat-rate pricing (no surprises)

  • S3-compatible

  • Good for video archival and access

• Cons:

  • 90-day minimum storage duration

  • Occasional lag in feature parity with AWS

---

🔹 Google Cloud Storage

• Use Case: Media storage with advanced access control and global redundancy

• Cost:

  • ~$0.02/GB/month (Standard)

  • ~$0.004/GB/month (Coldline/Archive)

  • Egress and request costs similar to AWS

• Pros:

  • Powerful analytics and ML integration

  • Globally distributed

• Cons:

  • Complicated billing

  • Egress can kill your budget if misconfigured

---

🔹 Microsoft Azure Blob Storage

• Similar use cases to Amazon S3 and Google Cloud.

• Offers Archive tier ($0.00099/GB) and Hot tier ($0.018/GB)

• Complex lifecycle management but enterprise-grade features.

---

🧠 TL;DR – Which Should You Use?

---

💡 Bonus Tip: Mixing Storage Tiers

If you’re using something like S3 or Google Cloud, you can configure lifecycle policies to automatically move old video files to cheaper archive tiers after X days:

• 0–30 days: Hot/Standard (for frequent access)

• 30–90 days: Nearline

• 90+ days: Archive / Glacier

This ensures you only pay premium rates for the files you’re actively using.

---

💾 Option 2: Network Attached Storage (NAS)

A NAS is your local file powerhouse, ideal for ongoing projects and team access.

Pros:

• Fast Local Access – Edit straight from the NAS.

• Redundancy – RAID protects from drive failure.

• Control – You own your storage environment.

Cons:

• Cost – Initial setup can be pricey.

• Upkeep – You’ll need to handle security, drive replacements, etc.

Popular Picks:

• Synology DS923+ or DS1522+

• QNAP TVS-h674 for high-end 10GbE performance

---

📼 Option 3: LTO Tape Storage

The gold standard in Hollywood. LTO is unmatched for ultra-long-term archiving.

Pros:

• Archival Lifespan – 30+ years is standard.

• Low Cost per TB – Perfect for massive libraries.

• Offline Protection – Immune to ransomware.

Cons:

• Expensive Hardware – LTO drives start around $4,000.

• Slower Access – Tapes are sequential, not random-access.

• Tech Lock-In – New LTO drives may not support old tape formats.

---

🛠 Recommended Workflows

🧑‍💻 For Solo Creators / Small Studios

• Working Files: Fast SSD or 4-bay NAS

• Local Backup: External HDD

• Off-Site: Backblaze B2 or Wasabi for peace-of-mind cloud storage

---

🏢 For Production Studios / Large Teams

• Active Projects: High-speed NAS with RAID and 10GbE

• Recent Projects: Slower NAS or high-capacity external drive

• Long-Term Archive: LTO system with 2 copies – one on-site, one stored off-site

---

🔐 Final Thoughts: Protect Your Legacy

Archiving isn’t just about saving space—it’s about preserving your creative legacy. With the right mix of speed, redundancy, and cost-efficiency, your content will remain safe and accessible long after the final cut.